Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piedmont, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chae, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Five-Factor Model of Personality

Development and Validation of the NEO PI-R for Koreans

Ralph L. Piedmont

Loyola College in Maryland

Joon-Ho Chae

Sogang University

Increasing interest is being directed toward demonstrating the cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality. This report outlines the development and initial validation of a Korean version of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R), a commercially available instrument designed to capture these five major dimensions. Study 1 involved Korean nationals (320 men and 334 women) and documented the reliability and structural validity of the new translation. Correlations with the Korean version of the MBTI and Impostor Phenomenon Scale provided preliminary validity evidence. Study 2 included 57 men and 59 women who were bilingual Korean expatriates living in the United States. These individuals took both the Korean and English versions of the NEO PI-R. Results indicated that the Korean version can be considered a parallel form to its English counterpart. The etic and emic implications of these results are discussed.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 2, 131-155 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022197282001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. Rossier, D. Dahourou, and R. R. McCrae
Structural and Mean-Level Analyses of the Five-Factor Model and Locus of Control: Further Evidence From Africa
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2005; 36(2): 227 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
I. Choi and Y. Choi
Culture and Self-Concept Flexibility
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2002; 28(11): 1508 - 1517.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
S. T. Menon and L. C. Hartmann
Generalizability of Menon's Empowerment Scale: Replication and Extension with Australian Data
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2002; 2(2): 137 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
K. Yoon, F. Schmidt, and R. Ilies
Cross-Cultural Construct Validity of the Five-Factor Model of Personality among Korean Employees
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2002; 33(3): 217 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
R. R. McCRAE
Trait Psychology and the Revival of Personality and Culture Studies
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2000; 44(1): 10 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
K. A. MASTOR, P. JIN, and M. COOPER
Malay Culture and Personality: A Big Five Perspective
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2000; 44(1): 95 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2000; 60(2): 236 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. E. Kurtz, P. A. Lee, and J. L. Sherker
Internal and Temporal Reliability Estimates for Informant Ratings of Personality Using the NEO PI-R and IAS
Assessment, June 1, 1999; 6(2): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
A. T. Church and W. J. Lonner
The Cross-Cultural Perspective in the Study of Personality: Rationale and Current Research
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 32 - 62.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. R. McCrae, P. T. Costa Jr., G. H. Del Pilar, J.-P. Rolland, and W. D. Parker
Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 171 - 188.
[Abstract]